Ancient Egyptian And Ancient Greek’s Comparison

Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Greek’s Comparison

Use of Geometry


The use of geometry in Egyptian art, the striding figure, is less emphasized in the fact that symmetry is not used to portray the total amount of features in both right and the still left sides. The angular edges of the joints and limps stand for additional of arcs than corners and sharp bends. In cases like this, it is deductive that the usage of geometry is minimal as the art does not concentrate on the total amount of opposing sides. If geometry is usually to be applied in this case to research the application of proportions that follow a particular ratio sequence, it will be clear that hardly any emphasis is put on balance the pieces. From the visual point of view, it really is clear that the limps aren’t similar in proportions and form.


The application of geometry regarding Greek art is considerably more pronounced than in the Egyptian circumstance. The line of symmetry, aside from the presence of a visible one, can be dependant on assessing the measurements extending from the main vertical regions. Alternatively, it is clear a sequence has been implemented in rendering the styles of the different body parts of the physique. Considering Greek art, it is easy to notice the angular differences compared to Egyptian art. In this case, it is conclusive that Egyptian artwork is more of traditional and region-based unlike Greek, which is much geometrical and cultural-centered. The difference of the tradition and tradition can be observed in the usage of available technology of Greek and software of main know-how in Egyptian artwork.

Use of Anatomy


The usage of anatomical features in Egyptian artwork is limited to some points unlike in Greek artwork. In Egyptian art, the primary or the anatomical factor is considered to be the head covered with an Egyptian cloak to symbolize traditions and cultural orientation. In addition, the lower abdomen is covered as well and the exposed areas of the body are limited within ethical traces. The covering of the low abdomen not only implies that the artist was hypersensitive to the thought of morals, but it also implies that the showcasing is really a specific life-style of a certain group.


The Greek art work, Diadoumenos, is raw with regard to exposure to the anatomical facts. The rawness of the art work is in the truth that none of the body pieces is included. Unlike in the Egyptian circumstance, this could be attributed to the thought of the opportunity to represent reality instead of imagination. Regarding Egyptian art, the looks of the upper body symbolizes that the body represents a male and all of those other facts are left to the creativeness of the observer. Alternatively, the Greek art exposes facts to represent a male body in his bathing suit. Aside from the concerns of the facts, this figure represents a many factual method of the anatomy of the individual figure. It is distinct that the Greek was extra focused on details compared to the Egyptians in consideration of these figures.

Use of Balance


The fact that the Egyptian figure appears to be more static than the Greek one portrays more lack of balance. Balance, in this case, can be defined in two types; the proportional stability portrayed by anatomical functions (symmetry) and balance when it comes to posture. Given that the symmetrical balance was talked about in the geometry part of this essay, the concentrate is more shifted to postural balance. In spite of the supportive lenience provided by an extension of the wall-like feature, the Egyptian figure seems to be struggling with balance. From the look of the striding posture and the aligning of the arms, such combination from a practical point of view pulls the bodily center of gravity somewhere around the lower back (increasing instability).


The information of the Greek amount is that it symbolizes an athlete tying a fillet around his brain. The posture of the amount portrays the potential of activity from the athlete. In cases like this, the spread-out hands, the curved torso, and the keeping the feet portray a well balanced posture for balance. In cases like this, the balance of your body is a lot certain than in the Egyptian figure. It appears that the use of geometry is really a main factor in the establishment of harmony in carving. In addition, the utilization of supportive elements in both statistics is different and thus implies that the Greek figure uses fewer support compared to the Egyptian figure due to geometrical balance proven in anatomical profiling.

Usage of Rhythm


Rhythm can be explained as the ultimate connection between pieces to portray the move of posture and components of art. The format where the Egyptian figure is portrayed implies that the performer portrays the static position for the figure. In this instance, it is a certain stage of a striding human where in fact the body shortly stops. On the other hand, from the position of the arms, it isn’t clear why the shape is in striding posture; for the reason that the combination that would produce rhythm would demonstrate a striding position along with a forward-stretched arm. Therefore, using rhythm, in this instance, is minimal, if it is present.


The Greek figure utilizes rhythm in portraying positional postures and a variety of various details to portray exactly the same. The curved torso and the spread arms are combined to give a striking potential of movement while the feet portray a supportive frame for the movements. The facial looks and the bodily structure of the figure are joined to display masculine and anatomical rhythm. The two figures can be appreciated in their specific traditional and cultural perspectives, but the presence and lack of rhythm in any of them can be blamed on the skill bias of the respective artist.

Differences Portrayed by the Figures


There are numerous physical distinctions deducible from the figures. On the other hand, it is easy to explain the cultural and traditional distinctions portrayed by both numbers. Before venturing in to the traditional or revisiting the actual physical differences, it is very important describe the differences existing between your two artists in charge of these figures. The Egyptian situation demonstrates the artist was additional patriotic of his appreciation of manual modeling through resemblance figures. The design of the Egyptian figure demonstrates the artist emphasized considerably more on the factors of truth within his moral and expertise.


In the Greek shape, the artist will not strike an observer as one who used resemblance as the central guide to creating this figure. The rhythm and balance in both symmetry and posture display an additional touch of construction and developmental alterations aimed at realizing a central goal, perfection.

Ideas Portrayed in a Broad Cultural Sense

The two figures represented in this essay portray a strong sense of cultural ideas that have been developed to pass along messages about the places of origin as well as the ability of the artists within the respective ancient settings. The broad cultural suggestions portrayed in the Egyptian physique include the condition of mathematical and geometrical knowledge in Egyptian artists, lack of emphasis in details in the ancient Egyptian art, and manual modeling as part of original art.

In the Greek physique, it is known that the Greeks are top mathematicians and many geometrical advances and discoveries have originated from them. In this case, the Greek physique portrays the broad cultural idea of geometrical know-how of the figure’s origin. The creations of symmetrical figures show that the Greeks portray artistic abilities by making use of sources at their disposal to define their heritage and customs.

The portrayal of Several Religious and Cultural Thoughts

The primary religious and cultural thoughts portrayed by the statistics outline a number of differences that represent the annals of both countries in the artistic areas. Culturally, ancient Greek skill follows a criterion that includes geometry to effect a result of the essence of traditional means of life. In addition, the type of the Greek figure implies that the religious bias of individuals will not take offense in creative nudity and portrayal of genital areas in figures of the skill. The above point is probably not true in practice, however in regards to Greek history, skill has been a life-style, and nudity in art statistics has become portrayed in holy cathedrals.

For the circumstance of the Egyptian figure, the primary cultural difference in ideas when compared to Greek is in the usage of geometry. The customs of the Egyptians as portrayed by this body implies that mathematical and geometrical advancements came in later dates. Furthermore, somebody who has used cloaks to deal with the top and the lower abdomen is known as to be always a divine one. With the proper execution of the figure, the building blocks shows that Egyptian art represents bulk creation as a symbol of permanence. Religiously, the coverings show that some feeling of morality will be emphasized to blend with the spiritual bias of the Egyptians.

The difference in Art Forms

The Egyptian and Greek art forms represent numerous elements of specific cultures. The usage stone carvings in Egyptian art work shows that Egypt is certainly endowed with craftsmen and artisans. The portrayal of a notable figure implies that Egypt’s form of leadership is really a cultural point blended with moral factors of respect and honor. Alternatively, the Greek figure implies that Greeks were notable in geometry (exhibit of hinge tips) and used it to establish their type of art. Lastly, the amount represents an idealized man hero exhibiting everyone rather than limited by prominence like in Egyptian art work.


Douglas, Bailey. Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic . London: Routledge Publishers, 2005.

Dunn, Christopher. Shed Technologies of Old Egypt: Advanced Engineering in the Temples of the Pharaohs . Vermont: Bear&Provider, 2010. Web.

Hodge, Susie. Ancient Egyptian Art work . Raintree, SA: Heinemann, 2006.

Stokstad, Marilyn. Art History: Old Art . SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: Pearson Knowledge, 2007.

Tarbel, F. A BRIEF HISTORY of Greek Art work . Meadville: The Chautauqua Press, 2004.

UNESCO. World heritage Centre.ANCIENT GREEK LANGUAGE Art . Web.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.