Biomedical Ethics In Christian Narrative

Biomedical Ethics found in Christian Narrative

  • Introduction

    The case study of ‘Healing and Autonomy’ demonstrates how Christians can make inappropriate decisions regarding the treatment of their children. In the case study, Mike and Joanne are parents who have an ailing son, James. The parents contemplate providing the best care for their son, according to their Orlando beliefs and rules. James has severe glomerulonephritis along with hypertonie and build-up regarding fluid in your body, which often predisposes him in order to kidney failure.

    Even though the medical doctor advised Mike in addition to Joanne that immediate dialysis was critical to remove excess fluid and alleviate blood pressure, they opted for the healing faith service in line with their Christian beliefs and principles. Owing to delayed dialysis, the kidney of James deteriorated to an extent where kidney transplant was the only viable treatment option. In the analysis of the case study, this essay examines pressing issues from the Christian perspective, the inappropriateness of Mike’s decisions, medical ethics, and relevant recommendation.

    Pressing Issues from a Christian Perspective

    Faith in God is one of the pressing issues from the Christian perspective since it affects the way the parents treat their son. From the case study, the medical doctor informed the moms and dads about the condition of James and advised them that he requires immediate dialysis to remove excess fluid and alleviate blood pressure. Although James required immediate dialysis, the parents opted to trust in God for they believe God is all-powerful, which is a primary reality of Christians. As the existence of God with infinite powers is the prime reality of Christians, Mike and Joanne prioritized in order to God’s intervention. Despite the fact that their faith found in God did not necessarily aid in improving the particular condition of their particular son, parents vacillate on whether in order to consent to renal transplant or keep on having faith inside God.

    The healing services in their cathedral is also a pressing concern from your Christian viewpoint, which persuades moms and dads to delay health care treatment for boy. From the example, it is evident the parents seen their close buddy regaining mobility throughout the faith curing service when their particular pastor prayed regarding him, and hence, they expect the particular same connection with the particular miracle to occur to their son. Based on the miracle experience, the parents insist that their son requires typically the faith healing services despite the health care persuasion that their particular son needs important dialysis to get rid of excess fluid in addition to alleviate hypotension. Consequently, the experience regarding miracle is typically the premise that persuades the parents to purchase faith healing services as the finest alternative treatment.

    Christian values is yet another pressing concern that may be evident found in the case review. Through the Christian worldview, Christians believe of which what is completely wrong has an abuse and exactly what is good offers a blessing. Within the case research, parents placed their own faith in Lord, plus they had excellent hopes that their own son would cure. However , disappointment shows up when parents mentioned that their child did not heal, while per their expectation, instead, his issue deteriorated further. Through their Christian perspective, the parents perceived that God do not heal their own son because Lord was punishing him and them with regard to not having sufficient faith. Thus, Orlando ethics is a good issue because it dissuades the parents through attributing the going down hill condition of their own son to their own decisions and activities.

    The inappropriateness of Mike’s Choices

    The analysis associated with Mike’s decisions displays that they may be incorrect because they are generally not simply irrational although also damaging to David. One of typically the irrational and hazardous decisions that Robert made is not acting on immediately the dialysis involving James and in search of treating the beliefs healing service. Just after an analysis involving James’ condition, typically the doctor informed Robert that he demands urgent dialysis to take out excess fluid and even alleviate blood strain in order to avoid kidney malfunction.

    Using the knowledge of the particular condition of Wayne and potential effects, Mike perceived that will it was wise to have belief in God, plus thus, he wanted treatment from your faith-healing service. With this see, Mike’s decision has been irrational for this ignored medical advice, also it was harmful, a consequence that will made James’s kidney deteriorate.

    Further analysis associated with the decisions that will Mike makes implies that they are arbitrary depending on prevailing problems, and therefore, irrational. Because Mike sought therapy from your faith-healing support depending on his belief and belief, this individual expected miracle curing. Nevertheless , when the particular healing failed, plus the condition associated with James deteriorated, Paul was desperate with regard to he had zero option except getting James to the particular hospital. In this particular view, your decision in order to bring James towards the hospital constitutes a good irrational act associated with desperation for Paul to have zero medical and scientific cause for this.

    Moreover, Mike qualities the failure to be able to heal his kid throughout the faith treatment in order to the too little faith and dope chastisement. Mike’s remise shows he features not accepted the faults, and so, this individual will continue enhancing his faith in addition to seeking divine payoff to save his / her son.

    As Mike is usually indecisive, the medical doctor should not keep on permitting him making decisions regarding the therapy of James. Also after making reasonless decisions and creating grave harm in order to James, Mike is usually still indecisive. Inside the case study, the doctor informed Mike about the condition of James and recommended for urgent dialysis, but James overlooked. As a consequence, James’ kidneys deteriorated to an extent where the transplant is the only visible medical option. However , Mike is yet to consent to kidney transplant for he believes that sufficient faith in God and abolition of punishment through prayer would heal his son.

    Medical Ethics

    The analysis of the case study reveals that treatment refusal is an ethical issue that stands out. The right to refuse treatment stems from the ethical principle of autonomy, which gives patients the justification to make informed selections regarding their well being (Chagani, 2012). Since James is as well young to exercising the proper of autonomy, his parents work out it on his / her behalf. Parents have got the right in order to exercise the autonomy of these children thus long they selections and actions are really in line using their best interests in addition to wishes (Parsapoor, Parsapoor, Rezaei, & Asghari, 2014). The examination of the watch case study exhibits that parents performed not exercise the particular autonomy of their particular son appropriately regarding their decisions in addition to actions had their particular basis on spiritual beliefs and activities.

    The particular decisions and steps of parents, in case study, contradicted those of the doctor. Based to Parsapoor ou al. (2014), also though parents hold the right to exercising autonomy of their particular children in declining treatment, their selections and actions are really limited to the particular realm of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Fundamentally, the ethical principle of beneficence allows the healthcare suppliers to overrule typically the autonomous decision regarding treatment refusal in the parents and supply sensible treatment although the ethical basic principle of nonmaleficence shields the patients coming from undue harm coming from decisions and steps of other folks (Macklin, 2003).

    The case examine demonstrates that typically the parents violated typically the ethical principles regarding beneficence and nonmaleficence because acted in opposition to medical health advice given by simply the doctor. Additionally, in respecting typically the autonomy of sufferers, Chagani (2012) suggests healthcare providers to be able to obey the ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, and provide appropriate treatment irrespective of the refusal of treatment.

    In the aspect of organ donation, the case study demonstrates that Christians permit their use in saving lives. Seeing that the condition of their son can be a matter of life and death, the parents are willing to donate their kidneys. Church members and friends are also willing to donate their kidneys to save the life of James. Therefore, their willingness shows that Christian beliefs do not bar parents, church members, and friends from donating their kidneys to save lives. Oliver, Ahmed, and Woywodt (2012) argue that organ donation in addition to the transplant is usually ethical if you have zero compulsion because of it removes the ethical rules of autonomy in addition to self-determination. Yet , faith based beliefs and a great informed consent fog up the requirements regarding organ donation found in the case examine.


    As a result of irrational and damaging effects of selections in case study, Christian believers must change their particular worldview and consider sickness as a new physical state as an alternative of a psychic state. From typically the physical perspective, Adam became sick since of bacterial illness causing glomerulonephritis although excess fluid in addition to hypertension caused degeneration in the kidney. Offered that factors that contributed to the problem emanate from recognized physical causes, Christians should not associate them to inadequate belief in God or divine punishment, which usually are spiritual aspects. As an Alfredia, Mike should think about advice from healthcare providers and pray for divine treatment.

    In addition, Mike should cause that God offers given human beings knowledge and skills of treating illnesses, which religious philosophy should not confront.


    The truth study demonstrates precisely how religious beliefs, in such a case, Christian beliefs have got a negative influence for the treatment of some sort of patient. The Christian believers beliefs made mom and dad violate the moral principles of autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. advises that Mike must look into medical advice when exercising autonomy in behalf of David and ensuring of which his actions and even decisions comply using the ethical guidelines of beneficence and even nonmaleficence.


    Chagani, S. (2012). Telling the real truth: A tussle involving four principles involving ethics. Clinical Research & Bioethics, 5 (2), 1-2.

    Macklin, R. (2003). Applying the several principles. Journal of Health-related Ethics, 19 (1), 275-280.

    Orr, 3rd there’s r., Novotny, W., & Perkin, R. (2005). Faith-based decisions: Mom and dad who refuse ideal maintain their young children. Us Medical Association Log of Ethics , 5(8), 1-5.

    Parsapoor, Some sort of., Parsapoor, M., Rezaei, N., & Asghari, F. (2014). Autonomy of children plus adolescents in permission to treatment: Honest, jurisprudential, and legal considerations. Iranian Journal associated with Pediatrics, 24 (3), 241-248.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.