Physician-Assisted Suicide: Arguments Against

  • Introduction

    In modern healthcare, there are numerous practices that polarize society, and physician-assisted suicide is 1 of these. Since the particular practice involves exactly what many keep company with a good act of getting rid of, the universal legalization of PAS offers implications for healthcare ethics. Judging through modern researchers’ functions, PAS is recognized as because an inappropriate exercise due to the effects on provider-patient relationships, physicians’ ethical injury, as well as the accounting allowance of life.


    Given that will PAS differs through euthanasia along with other methods associated with the particular provision of support in dying, qualifiers and definitions are usually necessary. Both PASSING and euthanasia are usually ethically controversial, yet the latter consists of some direct activities that immediately result in a patient’s dying. As for PASSING, will not involve the particular same level of doctors’ participation within the deliberate termination of existence. As is crystal clear from the phrase, PAS can become defined as the particular provision of equipment (drugs, etc. ) to be accessed by terminally sick patients to deal with unbearable struggling.

    1st Con-Point

    People who believe that PAS is a harmful practice often explain their position with reference to the basic values in relationships between healthcare providers and individuals. For instance, Anderson (2015) who will be the Heritage Basis researcher justifies the particular inappropriateness of PASSING discussing mutual have confidence in in healthcare. Based on him, the really fact that “the tools of recovery are used because techniques for killing” can prevent individuals from trusting health care providers (Anderson, 2015, p. 2).

    Banovic, Turanjanin, plus Miloradovic (2017) are usually three Serbian experts in the field of medical ethics who also refer to the potential effects of PAS on relationships. They claim that a sense of guilt after using this practice can negatively affect patient-provider interactions (Banovic et al., 2017). The absence of trust in such relationships can potentially impact healthcare quality in many ways, including the growth of anti-medicine movements, and this is why the evidence highlights an important ethical issue.

    2nd Con-Point

    The inappropriateness of the practice in question is often discussed with reference to the effects that PAS has on physicians’ mental health. In their academic article devoted to the ethical perceptions of PAS, Banovic et al. (2017) thoroughly discuss physicians’ attitudes to this practice and its potential mental health effects. According to their conclusions, more than 56% of physicians in Serbia believe that PAS is ethically inappropriate in any circumstances (Banovic et al., 2017).

    Such opinions can be related to a number of factors, including healthcare providers’ religious values and the fear of moral suffering as an effect of PAS (Banovic et al., 2017). The evidence suggests that the legal status of PAS and its ethical appropriateness may need to be analyzed from the perspective of healthcare providers who are sometimes expected to violate their personal principles.

    3rd Con-Point

    PAS is also criticized due to its potential ability to change values in healthcare and the logical inconsistency of arguments supporting it. The study by Sulmasy, Travaline, Mitchell, and Ely (2016) who specialize in medicine explains this argument in a detailed way. According to the researchers, PAS is said to aid human existence since the ultimate worth (Sulmasy et ing., 2016) However, within fact, the determination to provide equipment for suicide cheapens life and offers it as some thing that could be handled easily (Sulmasy ainsi que al., 2016).

    Based on like claims, the common recognition and normalization of PAS may have harmful extensive consequences related in order to the perceptions associated with life and the value. The danger that human existence will once become regarded as house shows numerous honest concerns related in order to the practice.


    To amount it up, contemporary authors who possess experience of medication criticize PAS credited to its possible effects on the particular quality of health care and the basics of medical integrity. In particular, this is stated that will PAS can guide to deficiencies in have confidence in in patient-provider associations and cause physicians’ moral suffering. Simultaneously, there are issues associated with the accounting allowance of human existence.


    Anderson, R. T. (2015). Four issues with physician-assisted suicide. The Heritage Basis Issue Brief, 4370, 1-3. Web.

    Banovic, B., Turanjanin, V., & Miloradovic, A. (2017). A good ethical overview of euthanasia and physician-assisted committing suicide. Iranian Journal associated with Public Health, 46(2), 173-179.

    Sulmasy, D. P., Travaline, J. M., Mitchell, L. A., & Ely, E. Watts. (2016). Non-faith-based quarrels against physician-assisted committing suicide and euthanasia. The Linacre Quarterly, 83(3), 246-257.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.